If you are a new business owner, you likely have spent a good deal of
time trying to determine what domain name will be best for your
operations. To this end, you may have taken the steps necessary to
determine the availability of a particular name. In fact, finding that
it is available may have made you very pleased. Not registering the
name upon your first visit, you return a couple of days later to find
that someone else has registered the name you wanted in the interim.
Of course, this all could have been a coincidence. Nonetheless, in this
day and age, a more likely possibility may be that another entity
actually tracked your search for a particular domain name and
intentionally registered that name itself. Those entities that are now
engaging in this insidious practice are said to be domain name spying.
In fact, there now appear to be operations that solely engage in this
practice.
The reality is that there is nothing new about operators interfering
with a bona fide business's attempts to register a domain name.
Cybersquatting involves registering a name confusingly similar to a
trademark and then offering to sell that name to the trademark's actual
owner for a greatly inflated price. There are other practices that
interfere with legitimate attempts to register domain names, including
tasting and kiting.
Domain name tasting is a process that takes advantage of the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) policy that allows a
five day grace period in which a domain name can be returned. A taster
registers numerous names in order to generate advertising income from
short term ownership to determine which names might be most profitable
over the long haul. If the registrant finds that certain names don't
meet his or her goals, it is simply returned.
Domain kiting actually takes the tasting concept a step further.
Through kiting the ICANN grace period is abused. As with tasting, the
registrant will return a name at the end of the ICANN five day grace
period. The difference between kiting and tasting is that when the
registrant returns the domain name, the registrant will then quickly
reacquire the same name all over again. Essentially, a registrant
engaging in kiting will retain ownership of the name in question over an
extended period of time and will never pay for that ownership.
By understanding tasting and kiting, a reader can appreciate how domain
name spying is an outgrowth of these practices. The difference rests in
the fact that spying is intended to target those names that someone
else or another business enterprise has a specific interest in owning.
At this juncture, it is not specifically known how a domain name spy
gathers information relating to another business checking on the
availability of a name.
Some victims of domain name spies may have at least some recourse
through trademark and cybersquatting laws. However, if a domain name
spy does not violate these laws, a business actually may have no remedy
at this juncture.
If you find that you have been victimized while checking the availability of a name, you probably will end up with two choices:
1. select another domain name
2. pay the spy a premium for the name you actually want
The best way to avoid becoming a victim of domain name spying is to
purchase immediately any name that you may have an interest in.
Remember, if you elect not to use a certain name, you have five days to
return that domain name with no charge to you.
Just another free Blogger theme
0 comments:
Post a Comment